Subscribe News by Email<snip>
And if you accept Josephus let me remind you that there was no such place as Nazareth in his day with all the implications therewith.
<bigger snio>
And finally all these 3 are ...
 |
|
| Search found 4 matches | |
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Brian_Fegely
Replies: 8 Views: 46888 
|
 Forum: Holy Royal Arch and Beyond the Craft, Rites included Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 12:36 am Subject: Let's suppose the "keystone" we use weren't a keys |
|
|
|
Brian_Fegely
Replies: 8 Views: 46888
|
Forum: Holy Royal Arch and Beyond the Craft, Rites included Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2006 11:34 pm Subject: Let's suppose the "keystone" we use weren't a keys note: the NJB reads this as "Consecrated to Yhwh
First Kodesh in no way can mean 'consecrated' as it is written HEKDESH would be the appropriate word , altho the inference is there. Grammar ... |
|
|
|
Brian_Fegely
Replies: 8 Views: 46888
|
Forum: Holy Royal Arch and Beyond the Craft, Rites included Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2006 3:41 pm Subject: Let's suppose the "keystone" we use weren't a keys "dbent" wrote, where I had asked if the legend on the Royal Arch "keystone" might be a bad transliteration of the "consecrated to YHWH"/"Holiness to the Lord" e ...
|
|
|
|
Brian_Fegely
Replies: 8 Views: 46888
|
Forum: Holy Royal Arch and Beyond the Craft, Rites included Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2005 9:26 pm Subject: Let's suppose the "keystone" we use weren't a keys "They made the rosette of the holy diadem of pure gold, and wrote on it an inscription, like the engraving of a signet 'Holiness to the Lord' (note: the NJB reads this as "Consecrated to Yhw ...
|
|
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP
visitors currently on the site.
visitors today (GMT+1)
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
Design by phpBBStyles.com | Styles Database